Hoje em dia, tendemos a nos comunicar pelo teclado tanto quanto verbalmente. Muitas vezes, estamos com pressa, rapidamente enviando e-mails com erros de digitação, atalhos gramaticais (estou sendo gentil aqui), e isso é alegre, por exemplo. cummings, não-caps olhar. Isso é esperado. Não é grande coisa. Mas outras vezes, tentamos investir um pouco de cuidado, evitando erros, para que não haja confusão sobre o que estamos dizendo e para parecermos profissionais e razoavelmente brilhantes.
Esse não é o caso das comunicações por escrito. Quando cometemos um crime gramatical em e-mails, postagens de discussão, relatórios, memorandos e outros documentos profissionais, não há como voltar atrás. Acabamos de gravar oficialmente como descuidados ou sem noção. E aqui está a pior coisa. Não é necessário ser um editor, um especialista em idiomas ou um triatleta de abelhas para identificar tais erros. Eles têm uma maneira de dançar um pouco na tela e, em seguida, estender a mão para agarrar o leitor pela garganta.
Portanto, aqui estamos na era do recurso sublinhado em vermelho do Word "ortografia incorreta, burro burro" e a opção Sempre verificar ortografia antes do envio do Outlook, e ainda assim os erros proliferam. Capturar erros de digitação é fácil (embora nem todos o façam). São as outras coisas - escritas corretamente, mas manejadas incorretamente - que escapam e nos fazem parecer estúpidas. Aqui está uma rápida revisão de alguns dos grandes.
1. Loose for lose
No: I always loose the product key. Yes: I always lose the product key.
2. It's for its (or god forbid, its') No: Download the HTA, along with it's readme file.
Yes: Download the HTA, along with its readme file. No: The laptop is overheating and its making that funny noise again.
Yes: The laptop is overheating and it's making that funny noise again. 3. They're for their for there
No: The managers are in they're weekly planning meeting. Yes: The managers are in their weekly planning meeting.
No: The techs have to check there cell phones at the door, and their not happy about it. Yes: The techs have to check their cell phones at the door, and they're not happy about it.
4. i.e. for e.g. No: Use an anti-spyware program (i.e., AdAware).
Yes: Use an anti-spyware program (e.g., AdAware). Note: The term i.e. means "that is"; e.g. means "for example." And a comma follows both of them.
5. Effect for affect No: The outage shouldn't effect any users during work hours.
Yes: The outage shouldn't affect any users during work hours. Yes: The outage shouldn't have any effect on users.
Yes: We will effect several changes during the downtime. Note: Impact is not a verb. Purists, at least, beg you to use affect instead:
No: The outage shouldn't impact any users during work hours. Yes: The outage shouldn't affect any users during work hours.
Yes: The outage should have no impact on users during work hours. 6. You're for your
No: Remember to defrag you're machine on a regular basis. Yes: Remember to defrag your machine on a regular basis.
No: Your right about the changes. Yes: You're right about the changes.
7. Different than for different from No: This setup is different than the one at the main office.
Yes: This setup is different from the one at the main office. Yes: This setup is better than the one at the main office.
8. Lay for lie No: I got dizzy and had to lay down.
Yes: I got dizzy and had to lie down. Yes: Just lay those books over there.
9. Then for than No: The accounting department had more problems then we did.
Yes: The accounting department had more problems than we did. Note: Here's a sub-peeve. When a sentence construction begins with If, you don't need a then. Then is implicit, so it's superfluous and wordy:
No: If you can't get Windows to boot, then you'll need to call Ted. Yes: If you can't get Windows to boot, you'll need to call Ted.
10. Could of, would of for could have, would have No: I could of installed that app by mistake.
Yes: I could have installed that app by mistake. No: I would of sent you a meeting notice, but you were out of town.
Yes: I would have sent you a meeting notice, but you were out of town.
No: I always loose the product key. Yes: I always lose the product key.
2. It's for its (or god forbid, its') No: Download the HTA, along with it's readme file.
Yes: Download the HTA, along with its readme file. No: The laptop is overheating and its making that funny noise again.
Yes: The laptop is overheating and it's making that funny noise again. 3. They're for their for there
No: The managers are in they're weekly planning meeting. Yes: The managers are in their weekly planning meeting.
No: The techs have to check there cell phones at the door, and their not happy about it. Yes: The techs have to check their cell phones at the door, and they're not happy about it.
4. i.e. for e.g. No: Use an anti-spyware program (i.e., AdAware).
Yes: Use an anti-spyware program (e.g., AdAware). Note: The term i.e. means "that is"; e.g. means "for example." And a comma follows both of them.
5. Effect for affect No: The outage shouldn't effect any users during work hours.
Yes: The outage shouldn't affect any users during work hours. Yes: The outage shouldn't have any effect on users.
Yes: We will effect several changes during the downtime. Note: Impact is not a verb. Purists, at least, beg you to use affect instead:
No: The outage shouldn't impact any users during work hours. Yes: The outage shouldn't affect any users during work hours.
Yes: The outage should have no impact on users during work hours. 6. You're for your
No: Remember to defrag you're machine on a regular basis. Yes: Remember to defrag your machine on a regular basis.
No: Your right about the changes. Yes: You're right about the changes.
7. Different than for different from No: This setup is different than the one at the main office.
Yes: This setup is different from the one at the main office. Yes: This setup is better than the one at the main office.
8. Lay for lie No: I got dizzy and had to lay down.
Yes: I got dizzy and had to lie down. Yes: Just lay those books over there.
9. Then for than No: The accounting department had more problems then we did.
Yes: The accounting department had more problems than we did. Note: Here's a sub-peeve. When a sentence construction begins with If, you don't need a then. Then is implicit, so it's superfluous and wordy:
No: If you can't get Windows to boot, then you'll need to call Ted. Yes: If you can't get Windows to boot, you'll need to call Ted.
10. Could of, would of for could have, would have No: I could of installed that app by mistake.
Yes: I could have installed that app by mistake. No: I would of sent you a meeting notice, but you were out of town.
Yes: I would have sent you a meeting notice, but you were out of town.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário